Clinical characteristics and risk factors of patients with COVID-19 developing barotrauma

Background: At our hospital, people with COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) had a high rate of pulmonary barotrauma. Therefore, the current study looked at barotrauma in COVID-19 patients getting invasive and non-invasive positive pressure ventilation to assess its prevalence, clinical results, and features. Methodology: Our retrospective cohort study comprised of adult COVID-19 pneumonia patients who visited our tertiary care hospital between April 2020 and September 2021 and developed barotrauma. Result(s): Sixty-eight patients were included in this study. Subcutaneous emphysema was the most frequent type of barotrauma, reported at 67.6%;pneumomediastinum, reported at 61.8%;pneumothorax, reported at 47.1%. The most frequent device associated with barotrauma was CPAP (51.5%). Among the 68 patients, 27.9% were discharged without supplemental oxygen, while 4.4% were discharged on oxygen. 76.5% of the patients expired because of COVID pneumonia and its complications. In addition, 38.2% of the patients required invasive mechanical breathing, and 77.9% of the patients were admitted to the ICU. Conclusion(s): Barotrauma in COVID-19 can pose a serious risk factor leading to mortality. Also, using CPAP was linked to a higher risk of barotrauma.Copyright © 2021 Muslim OT et al.

Corrigendum: Helmet ventilation for pediatric patients during the COVID-19 pandemic: A narrative review.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fped.2022.839476.].

Respiratory support for adult patients with COVID-19

The COVID-19 pandemic is creating unique strains on the healthcare system. While only a small percentage of patients require mechanical ventilation and ICU care, the enormous size of the populations affected means that these critical resources may become limited. A number of non-invasive options exist to avert mechanical ventilation and ICU admission. This is a clinical review of these options and their applicability in adult COVID-19 patients. Summary recommendations include: (1) Avoid nebulized therapies. Consider metered dose inhaler alternatives. (2) Provide supplemental oxygen following usual treatment principles for hypoxic respiratory failure. Maintain awareness of the aerosol-generating potential of all devices, including nasal cannulas, simple face masks, and venturi masks. Use non-rebreather masks when possible. Be attentive to aerosol generation and the use of personal protective equipment. (3) High flow nasal oxygen is preferred for patients with higher oxygen support requirements. Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation may be associated with higher risk of nosocomial transmission. If used, measures special precautions should be used reduce aerosol formation. (4) Early intubation/mechanical ventilation may be prudent for patients deemed likely to progress to critical illness, multi-organ failure, or acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).Copyright © 2020 The Authors. JACEP Open published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of the American College of Emergency Physicians.

Placental Thrombosis Resulting in Hypoxic Ischemic Encephalopathy in an Infant of a Mother with Covid-19

Case Report: Since the beginning of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, there has been much work to understand the negative effects of SARS-CoV-2 on tissues expressing the Angiotensin Converting Enzyme-2 (ACE2) receptor, including the placenta. However, there is limited information regarding placental pathology findings in mothers with COVID-19 and the effects of SARS-CoV-2 on the placenta. The available research reports effects on the fetus ranging from minimal to intrauterine fetal demise. Case Description: A 4680g baby boy was born at 38+1 weeks of gestation to 36y old G4P1021 female via repeat cesarian section. The pregnancy was complicated by advanced maternal age, chronic hypertension with superimposed pre-eclampsia with severe features, BMI of 80, and SARS-CoV-2 infection. The mother had mild COVID-19 symptoms and did not require hospitalization or oxygen support. Prenatal ultrasounds were limited due to body habitus. At the time of delivery, there was clear amniotic fluid. Upon delivery the infant was cyanotic and limp and was brought to the warmer immediately. Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation was initiated at 5 minutes of life with improvement in infant color and oxygen saturation. He was then admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU). APGARs were 2, 3, 5, and 7 at 1, 5, 10, and 15 minutes respectively. Cord gases showed severe metabolic acidosis. The patient was diagnosed with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) and therapeutic hypothermia was initiated. Both the NICU and obstetric teams were unable to identify a clear perinatal cause of HIE in this patient. Later, the placenta pathology report revealed a large placenta for estimated gestational age corresponding to the 75th percentile, villous parenchyma with focal chorangiosis and thrombi, with unremarkable fetal membrane and three vessel umbilical cord. The cause of HIE was then thought to be due to the placental thrombi likely caused by SARS-CoV-2 infection. Discussion(s): Fetal vascular malperfusion and fetal vascular thrombus have been noted as a common finding in the placentas of pregnant women who test positive for SARS-CoV-2. There are various causes of HIE, from maternal, placental and fetal factors. This patient had no clinically evident hypoxic event, but information was limited due to the lack of monitoring of the fetus in utero. Given the mother's SARS-CoV-2 infection and the placental pathology findings, it is likely that the cause of this patient's HIE was related to the effects on the placenta from SARS-CoV-2. Conclusion(s): As more information comes to light about the effects of SARS-CoV-2 on the placenta, it is important to consider a maternal SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy as a cause of HIE in a newborn.

Ventilator avoidance among critically ill COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome

Introduction: Misinformation citing mechanical ventilation, not the virus, as causing death in COVID-19 patients with respiratory failure has led to ventilator avoidance (initial refusal of intubation) during the pandemic. Method(s): Prospective observational cohort study (March 2020- June 2021) evaluating the incidence and significance of initial refusal of intubation in patients with critical COVID-19 defined as ARDS requiring > 55% sustained FiO2 on high flow nasal canula (HFNC), non-invasive positive-pressure ventilation (NIPPV) or requiring intubation. Outcomes included in-hospital mortality and 1-year modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score. Logistic regression was used to estimate the age and Charlson Comorbidity Index adjusted odds ratio (OR) of in-hospital death. The Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to evaluate differences in the mRs. Result(s): The cohort was predominantly non-Latino white (76%), male (65%), unvaccinated (99.4%), mean age of 66, and good pre- COVID-19 functional status (median mRs score of 0). Overall, 315 patients were critically ill due to COVID-19 with an in-hospital mortality of 41.9% (132/315;95% CI 36-47%). In patients in whom intubation was recommended 39% initially refused (40/102;95% CI 30-49%). Utilization of HFNC (90%) and NIPPV (72%) were similar between groups, however actual use of mechanical ventilation differed (98.4% in those that did not initially refuse compared to 20% in those that initially refused (p = 0.001)). In-hospital mortality was 79.3% (49/62) in those who initially did not refuse intubation compared to 77.5% (31/40) in those who refused (adjusted OR 1.3;95% CI 0.5-.5). The distribution of 1-year mRS was not significantly different between groups (p = 1.0) (Fig. 1). Conclusion(s): Among critically ill patients with COVID-19 associated ARDS, ventilator avoidance was common however, it was not associated with increased in-hospital mortality or a difference in 1-year functional outcome.

A nationwide cohort study of pregnant and postpartum patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonitis in ICU in Israel

Introduction: This study included pregnant patients with severe COVID to test the hypothesis that the impact of delivery on maternal outcome depends upon illness severity at the time of delivery;we hypothesized that patients not yet requiring IPPV would improve following delivery (due to improvement in respiratory mechanics), while patients already on IPPV, or close to requiring ventilation, would deteriorate (due to maternal cardiovascular intolerance to autotransfusion). Method(s): This multicenter, prospective/retrospective cohort study evaluated Israeli ICU admissions of pregnant women with COVID-19 pneumonitis from 1-Feb-2020 to 31-Jan-2022. We assessed maternal, neonatal outcomes and longitudinal maternal clinical data. The primary outcome was maternal outcome (no-IPPV, IPPV, ECMO, death). The primary longitudinal outcome was SOFA score, the secondary longitudinal outcome was the novel PORCH score (PEEP, Oxygenation, Respiratory-support, Chest-X-ray, Haemodynamic-support). Patients were classified into: no-delivery, postpartum admission, deliverycritical and delivery-not-critical groups. Result(s): 84 patients in 13 ICUs were analysed;there were 34 nodelivery, 4 postpartum, 32 delivery-critical, 14 delivery-not-critical patients. Delivery-critical and postpartum had worse outcomes with, 26/32(81%) and 4/4(100%) requiring IPPV;12/32(38%) and 3/4(75%) requiring ECMO;1/32(3%) and 2/4(50%) dying. Deliverynot- critical and no-delivery had far better outcomes with, respectively, 6/34(18%) and 2/14(14%) requiring mechanical ventilation;no patients required ECMO or died. SpO2, S/F ratio, P/F ratio in Deliverycritical deteriorated on the day of delivery, continued to deteriorate, and took longer to recover;delivery-not-critical improved rapidly following delivery. The day of delivery was a highly significant covariate for PORCH (p < 0.0001), not SOFA (p = 0.09). Conclusion(s): Interventional delivery should be considered for maternal indications before patients deteriorate and require IPPV.

Lung ultrasound scoring system vs ROX index as a predictor for progression to the invasive mechanical ventilation in COVID-19 patients

Background: During the outbreak of the highly contagious Coronavirus disease 19 (COVID19), rapid and simple prognostic tools were needed to support clinical decisions and predict the need of invasive mechanical ventilation. the ROX index, and the lung ultrasound score (LUSS) were proposed to objectively predict patient prognosis in addition to the subjective clinical assessment Aim: This study aimed to compare lung ultrasound score with ROX index in predicting the need of invasive ventilation in COVID-19 patients requiring advanced oxygen therapy. Patients and Methods: We studied 50 patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia in the intensive care unit in the isolated area at Kasr Al-Ainy hospital. Complete Medical history, physical examination and laboratory investigations were obtained on admission. All patients underwent bedside lung ultrasonography scan and LUSS was calculated at the 2nd and the 12th hours, also ROX index was calculated at the 2nd, 6th and 12th hours from initiating the advanced oxygen therapy. Result(s): From a total of fifty patients with COVID-19, 56.0% were males, with mean age of 65.98 + 11.68 years, and mortality rate was 68%. The optimal cut off value of the ROX index at (2, 6, 12 hour) is (2.495, 2.675, 3.06) respectively, (p <0.001) with sensitivity 90.9% and specificity 76.5% at the 12 hour. Also the optimal cut off point of LUSS is 25.50 (p <0.001) with sensitivity 93.9% and specificity 88.2% for prediction of the invasive mechanical ventilation. Conclusion and recommendations: The study concluded that LUSS is more sensitive in predicting the need of invasive mechanical ventilation than ROX index.Copyright © 2023, Codon Publications. All rights reserved.

Evaluation of lung cell populations in severe COVID-19 pneumonia

Introduction/Aim: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a novel viral infection that can cause severe pneumonia and acute respiratory failure;however, the mechanism of disease progression is still unclear. The aim of this study is to evaluate inflammatory cells in the lung by analysing cell populations of bronchial aspirates of COVID-19 pneumonia. Method(s): Eligible cases were diagnosed as COVID-19, confirmed by SARS-CoV-2 PCR. All cases had developed severe COVID-19 pneumonia and undergone invasive positive pressure ventilation for the treatment of respiratory failure. Bronchial aspirates were collected during endotracheal intubation, and SARS-CoV-2 PCR was done. The populations of obtained cells from bronchial aspirates were examined by Giemsa staining and immunohistochemical staining of CD3, CD4, CD8, CD20 and CD68 antigens. Bronchial aspirates were cultured to confirm respiratory bacterial co-infections. Result(s): A total of 14 cases (median age 70;eleven male and three female) were enrolled in this study. Their bronchial aspirates were all positive for SARS-CoV-2 PCR. Bacterial co-infections were developed in 10 cases, including 6 cases of pneumonia/respiratory tract infection, 2 cases of sepsis, and 2 cases of urinary tract infection. Cell populations of bronchial aspirates with or without bacterial co-infections were as follows: neutrophils 33.0% vs. 21.5%;CD3+ mononuclear cells (MNCs) 2.5% vs. 5.8%;CD4+ MNCs 4.6% vs. 3.4%;CD8+ MNCs 3.5% vs. 5.2%;CD20+ MNCs 0.2% vs. 0.1%;CD68+ MNCs 39.7% vs. 38.8%, respectively. Conclusion(s): CD68 antigen is mainly expressed in monocytes/macrophages. CD68+ MNCs were dominant in bronchial aspirates of the cases with severe COVID-19 pneumonia. Our data suggests that CD68+ MNCs, presumably macrophages, would play an essential role during the innate immune response to acute SARS-CoV-2 infection in the lung.

Pneumomediastinum (PM) as a complication of COVID-19 disease

Case report Introduction: PM is a rare, but potentially life-threatening complication during COVID 19 pandemic, being reported in patients affected by COVID-19 pneumonia, even in the absence of mechanical ventilation-related barotrauma. Case details: We reported the clinical data of 4 cases affected by COVID-19 pneumonia complicated with PM. Chest CT scan showed multiple confluent areas of ground-glass opacities, crazy paving pattern, PM, cervical subcutaneous emphysema, and pneumothorax in one case. Management included pharmacological treatment, oxygen supplementation and no acute intervention recommended by cardiothoracic surgery. Case 1: 50-year- old male without past medical history, non-smoker, hypoxic on the day of admission. During the hospital stay, he continued to require increasing levels of oxygen and was subsequently flown to a tertiary care center for higher level of care. Case 2: 38-year- old male admitted with a 7-day history of fever, dyspnea and cought. He continues to be symptomatic with neurological manifestations (COVID19 Encephalopathy). Finally whose dyspnea regressed during hospitalization, he was discharged at his own request to come for control. Case 3: 73-year- old male with a history of hypertension, non-smoker, presented with complaints of shortness of breath for 1 week. He did not receive non invasive positive pressure ventilation. The pneumothorax and PM were managed conservatively. Case 4: 53-year- old lady with no significant past medical history, presented with fever and cough for 10 days and worsening shortness of breath for two days. Progressive deterioration of respiratory function transferred her to the intensive care unit. In view of worsening hypoxia and increased work of breathing, she was intubated on the same day and was started on volume control ventilator support. Despite the support measures she developed multiple organ failure and passed 35 days after the symptoms initiated. Conclusion(s): PM is usually self-limiting and is managed conservatively. Treatment of the underlying causes and least damaging ventilator settings possible to achieve adequate oxygenation are the mainstays in managing PM. COVID-19 patients with PM seem to have a more complicated clinical course and poor outcome.

Acute hypercapnic respiratory failure in patients with obesity hypoventilation syndrome during the COVID-19 pandemic: Four case reports.

Obesity hypoventilation syndrome (OHS) can cause acute hypercapnic respiratory failure (AHRF). The onset of AHRF in four patients with OHS during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is reported in this study. Two men (23 and 45 years old) and two women (both 77 years old) presented to our hospital with AHRF. In the two elderly women, a prolonged supine position due to falls seemed to be the cause of AHRF. Treatment was started with bilevel positive airway pressure for all patients. While one patient died, the condition of the other three improved; they were discharged with continuous positive airway pressure. AHRF due to OHS was rarely reported in the rural region of Japan. It is suggested that increased rates of obesity due to lifestyle changes during the COVID-19 pandemic may be responsible for an increase in the prevalence of OHS-associated AHRF.

Case report: Spontaneous pneumomediastinum (SPM) and intestinal perforation secondary to COVID-19 in the same patient

Case History:A 73-year old male patient with Hypertensive Cardiomyopathy, pulmonary emphysema, dyslipidemia,presented to our Pulmonary Department for COVID-19 pneumonia associated with respiratory failure. He was started on medical therapy and high flow oxygen reduced during hospitalization,he was not treated with noninvasive ventilation. During hospitalization,he developed before SPM,showed chest CT scan,and we achieved good results with conservative management, consisting of bed rest with oxygen inhalation or supportive pain control. After ten days,as the patient complained of continued abdominal pain, computed tomography(CT)abdomen was ordered and revealed sigmoid colonic diverticular and intestinal perforation. He underwent to resected sigmoid colon but few days after surgery the patient died. Spontaneous pneumomediastinum (SPM),unrelated to positive pressure ventilation and intestinal perforation (IP)have been recently reported as an unusual complications in cases of COVID19 pneumonia. For SPM, the presumed pathophysiological mechanism is diffuse alveolar injury leading to alveolar rupture and air leak, for GP is unclear,the perforation could result from altered colonic motility due to neuronal damage in addition to local ischemia resulting from hypercoagulable state caused by the virus. We present a case of COVID-19 pneumonia complicated both SPM and IP in the same patient,not yet described in literature. On this basis,we believe it is vital to institute SARS-CoV-2 precautions in patients who present with either respiratory or gastrointestinal symptoms,therefore high index of suspicion is needed to further manage those patients and,thus,improve their outcome.

Long Term Sequale on COVID-19

Objective In 2021, accumulated coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) confirmed cases exceeded 100 million worldwide. We sought the long term sequale on COVID-19. Design and Method Although there is a hope for vaccination, continuous infection is observed with case fatality rate over 2%. Patients with cardiovascular disease are more susceptible to COVID-19 and show more severe clinical course after the infection. COVID-19 related myocardial injury evidenced by increased troponin plasma levels occur in at least 10% of hospitalized patients and 25% to 35% or more, of critically ill patients. Patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection related cardiac complications are heart failure, arrhythmia, acute thrombosis, and stress induced cardiomyopathy. Results Myocardial injury is an important entity that cause long term sequale. The extent of the local tissue damage and cytokine storm triggered by the host immune response both contribute to the severity of the myocarditis. An exaggerated inflammatory response can be extremely fatal, and immunomodulators such as corticosteroids are considered in selected cases even though the efficacy and safety is questionable. Combined with these mechanisms related to a host immune response, multiple factors are responsible for the cardiac consequence of COVID-19, such as an oxygen supply and demand imbalance (with or without coronary artery disease), increased right ventricular afterload due to respiratory acidosis, hypoxemia and positive pressure ventilation. Even though it is difficult to discriminate all the possible mechanisms related to myocarditis, accordingly the effort to identify the dominant cause is necessary for the selection of the proper target treatment. Conclusions Substantial evidence has suggested a non-negligible incidence of cardiac injury related to COVID-19. Although the clinical significance and exact mechanisms are under investigation, we should be aware of the potentially fatal cardiac manifestations when dealing with patients with COVID-19. Long-term complications are also noticed from the recent publications and need further attention.

Dual Oxygenation in Covid-19 - a Retrospective Cohorot Study

Background: Concerns regarding the availability of Positive Pressure Ventilation (PPV) have led the quest for alternative methods of oxygenation. One such method is Dual Oxygenation - the addition of a reservoir mask (RM) on top of a high flow nasal cannula (HFNC). Thus far, this method has not been formally evaluated. Method(s): The registry of all patients hospitalized between 1/1/2020-31/8/2021, in any one of six dedicated COVID19 wards of our tertiary hospital were reviewed. Inclusion required: 1) severe hypoxemia requiring the use of HFNC and 2) 18 years of age or older. Exclusion criteria were: 1) PPV (either noninvasive or invasive) initiated for any reason other than refractory hypoxemia (e.g. surgery) or 2) transfer to another facility while still on HFNC. The primary outcome was mortality within 30 days from the first application of HFNC. Secondary outcomes were the initiation of invasive intermittent positive pressure ventilation (IPPV) and admission to an ICU. Result(s): A total of 461 patients were included in the final analysis: 219 were treated with the combination of HFNC and RM (dual oxygenation) and 242 with HFNC alone (controls). No significant differences in the incidence of chronic diseases, smoking status or body mass index and markers of disease severity at presentation were noted between the groups. Mortality within 30 days of HFNC initiation (23.7% vs. 32.4%, Pv=0.048), rates of IPPV (49.3% vs. 58.7%, Pv=0.043) and ICU admissions (42.4% vs. 52.1%, Pv=0.039) were all significantly lower in the dual oxygenation group. Conclusion(s): Our study suggests that dual oxygenation may improve the short term prognosis of patients hospitalized with COVID-19 associated hypoxemic respiratory failure.

Molecular genetic markers associated with course of severe COVID-19 pneumonia. Different pathways study

Introduction: It is known that the development of COVID-19 in the human body consists of complex system of biological mechanisms underlying the complex interplay between infectious agents and the human host. This raised the question about hosts' genetic variants as predictors of clinical phenotype. The aim of our study was to analyze the effect of the NOS3 gene (VNTR intron 4 a/b), NR3C1 gene (C647G, rs41423247) and the SFTPB gene (C1580T, rs11130866) variants on the course of severe COVID-19 pneumonia in patients. Material(s) and Method(s): The study group included 20 patients (13 men and 7 women) with diagnosis "viral COVID19 pneumonia" treated at the intensive care unit. Investigation of the NOS3, NR3C1 and SFTPB genes variants was carried out by a molecular method using PCR-RFLP and allele-specific PCR, respectively. Result(s): The correlation analysis showed a significant association of the NOS3 gene variants and level of SpO2 (rS=-0.488, p=0.029;SpO2=93.1+/-2.4% for b/b and SpO2=82.0+/-1.1% for a/a genotypes). Also a significant positive correlation was between NR3C1 gene variants and duration of nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (nIPP) therapy (rS=0.454, p=0.044;for 647CC - 1.5+/-1.0 days and for 674GG - 3.9+/-2.5 days), presence of fever (need for antipyretics) (rS=0.525, p=0.017;647C vs 647G alleles - chi2=5.8, p=0.016). No significant correlations were found for the variants of SFTPB gene. The obtained results support a hypothesis about the combined influence of different pathways genes variants (NOS3 and NR3C1) on severity of COVID-19. However, in order to draw definite conclusions, further multifaceted research in this area are need.

Factors associated with non-invasive positive pressure ventilation failure in a COVID-19 Intermediate Care Unit

Aim: To evaluate the efficacy of NIPPV (CPAP, HELMET-CPAP or NIV) in COVID-19 patients treated in the dedicated COVID-19 Intermediate Care unit of Coimbra Hospital and University Centre (CHUC), Portugal, and to assess factors associated with NIPPV failure. Method(s): Patients admitted to the Intermediate Care Unit of CHUC, from December 1st 2020 to February 28th 2021, treated with NIPPV due to confirmed COVID-19 were included. The primary outcome was NIPPV failure (orotracheal intubation (OTI) or death during hospital stay). Factors associated with NIPPV failure were included in an univariate binary logistic regression analysis and those with a significance level of p<0.001 were selected to enter a multivariate regression model. Result(s): 163 patients were included, 64.4% were males (n=105) and the median age was 66 years (IQR 56-75). Overall, 97 patients (59.5%) were successfully treated with NIPPV, while failure was observed in 66 (40.5%), of which 26 (39.4%) were intubated and 40 (60.6%) died during hospital stay. Highest CRP during hospital stay (OR 1.164;95%CI 1.036-1.308) and morphine use (OR 24.771;95%CI 1.809-339.241) were identified as independent predictors in the multivariate logistic model. Adherence to prone positioning (OR 0.109;95%CI 0.017-0.700) and a higher value of the lowest platelet count during hospital stay (OR 0.977;95%CI 0.960-0.994) were associated with a favourable outcome. Conclusion(s): Highest CRP and morphine use were independent predictors of OTI or death. Adherence to prone positioning and a higher value of the lowest platelet count during hospital stay were associated with a favourable outcome.

Pneumomediastinum in COVID-19 critically ill patients

Pneumomediastinum in COVID-19 critically ill patients Introduction: Pneumomedisatinum(PM) is an uncommon potentially life-threatening complication of COVID-19 and can be an aggravating factor. This study aimed to determine the incidence and outcomes of PM in critically ill COVI19 patients. Method(s): A retrospective study carried out in a 9-bed intensive care unit from October 1st, 2020 to February 28, 2021 including patients with confirmed COVID19 related acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) with confirmed PM on Chest computed tomography (CT). Were recorded patients characteristics, management and outcomes. Result(s): 7 cases of PM were reported : 5 men, 2 women, aged between 47 and 70 years-old. None of them had underlying lung disease. 4 patients were under invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV), 2 under non-invasive ventilation (NIV) and one had a spontaneous PM at the time of the event. Chest CT scan showed : pulmonary involvement, moderate (n=4/7) to severe (n=3/7), PM (n=7/7), subcutaneous emphysema (n=5/7) and pneumothorax (n=2/7). The highest positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) for patients receiving IMV and NIV were respectively 10cmH2O and 6cmH2O. Urgent mediastinal decompression wasn't immediately indicated, conservative therapy with reduced airway pressure was adopted. Patients with NIV were intubated after NIV failure. Despite protective ventilation with lower pressure, needle aspiration and chest drainage, all patients expired during their hospital stay. Conclusion(s): Our findings suggest that PM is secondary to inflammatory response due to COVID-19 and mostly triggered by the use of positive pressure ventilation and it is associated with poor outcome in critically ill COVID-19 patients.

Incidence of Air Leaks in Critically Ill Patients with Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure Due to COVID-19.

Subcutaneous emphysema, pneumothorax and pneumomediastinum are well-known complications of invasive ventilation in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. We determined the incidences of air leaks that were visible on available chest images in a cohort of critically ill patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure due to coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) in a single-center cohort in the Netherlands. A total of 712 chest images from 154 patients were re-evaluated by a multidisciplinary team of independent assessors; there was a median of three (2-5) chest radiographs and a median of one (1-2) chest CT scans per patient. The incidences of subcutaneous emphysema, pneumothoraxes and pneumomediastinum present in 13 patients (8.4%) were 4.5%, 4.5%, and 3.9%. The median first day of the presence of an air leak was 18 (2-21) days after arrival in the ICU and 18 (9-22)days after the start of invasive ventilation. We conclude that the incidence of air leaks was high in this cohort of COVID-19 patients, but it was fairly comparable with what was previously reported in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure in the pre-COVID-19 era.

Guideline-based management of acute respiratory failure and acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Acute respiratory failure (ARF) is defined by acute and progressive hypoxemia caused by various cardiorespiratory or systemic diseases in previously healthy patients. Among ARF, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a serious condition with bilateral lung infiltration, which develops secondary to a variety of underlying conditions, diseases, or injuries. This review summarizes the current standard of care for ARF and ARDS based on current major guidelines in this field. When administering fluid in patients with ARF, particularly ARDS, restrictive strategies need to be considered in patients without shock or multiple organ dysfunction. Regarding oxygenation targets, avoiding excessive hyperoxemia and hypoxemia is probably a reasonable choice. As a result of the rapid spread and accumulation of evidence for high-flow nasal cannula oxygenation, it is now weakly recommended for the respiratory management of ARF in general and even for initial management of ARDS. Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation is also weakly recommended for the management of certain ARF conditions and as initial management of ARDS. Low tidal volume ventilation is now weakly recommended for all patients with ARF and strongly recommended for patients with ARDS. Limiting plateau pressure and high-level PEEP are weakly recommended for moderate-to-severe ARDS. Prone position ventilation with prolonged hours is weakly to strongly recommended for moderate-to-severe ARDS. In patients with COVID-19, ventilatory management is essentially the same as for ARF and ARDS, but awake prone positioning may be considered. In addition to standard care, treatment optimization and individualization, as well as the introduction of exploratory treatment, should be considered as appropriate. As a single pathogen, such as SARS-CoV-2, exhibits a wide variety of pathologies and lung dysfunction, ventilatory management for ARF and ARDS may be better tailored according to the respiratory physiologic status of individual patients rather than the causal or underlying diseases and conditions.

A Retrospective Analysis of Ventilatory Strategy Comparing Non-invasive Ventilation (NIV) With Invasive Ventilation in Patients Admitted With Severe COVID-19 Pneumonia.

Background The second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in India saw a sudden upsurge of critically ill patients getting admitted to the ICU. The guidance for respiratory support was unclear in the early phase. But later reports showed lower mortality with non-invasive ventilation (NIV) than with intubation. The aim of this study was to assess the end result of initial methods of ventilation in COVID-19 patients. Methodology Patients admitted to ICU with COVID-19 were categorized as group 1 (IPPV-intubated within 24 hrs of admission), group 2 (NIV -NIV only), group 3 (NIV+ IPPV-intubated after 24 hrs), and group 4 (NRBM - Non-Rebreathing Mask only). All causes in the hospital or 30-day mortality, length of stay in ICU, and incidence of pneumothorax were compared between groups. Logistic regression analysis was done to determine the odds of mortality. Results The overall mortality rate among patients admitted to tertiary care centers was 15% and the rate among patients in ICU was 54.07%. Patients in group 1 and group 3 had significantly high mortality rates of 90.47% and 93.75%, respectively, as compared to 51.28% in group 2 patients. The odds of mortality were high in group 3 (OR 29.57, 95% CI 4.51 and 193.52) and group 1 (OR 8.01, 95% CI 1.35 and 47.48). Conclusion In a resource-limited setting, the use of NIV is associated with higher survival in COVID-19 patients. The prognosis of patients who are intubated early or after a trial of NIV is the same with increased odds of mortality.

Pneumothorax in Critically Ill COVID-19 Patients in the Indian Subcontinent.

Background and aims: To explore the incidence and risk factors, as well as mortality, in critically ill COVID-19 patients who developed pneumothorax (PTX) and/or pneumomediastinum (PNM). Methods: A retrospective cohort study was undertaken to analyse data of all patients with moderate to severe COVID-19 disease who were either RTPCR positive or had a clinico-radiological diagnosis. The exposure group consisted of COVID-19 patients who presented with PTX/PNM, whereas the non-exposure group consisted of patients who did not develop PTX and/or PNM during the stay. Results: Incidence of PTX/PNM was observed to be 1.9% among critically ill COVID-19 patients. 94.4% (17/18) of patients in the PTX group received positive pressure ventilation (PPV); the majority of these patients were on non-invasive ventilation when they developed PTX/PNM; only one patient was receiving conventional oxygen therapy. COVID-19 patients who developed PTX/PNM had 2.7 times higher mortality. A mortality rate of 72.2% was observed in COVID-19 patients who developed PTX/PNM. Conclusion: Development of PTX/PNM in critically ill COVID-19 patients is associated with more severe disease involvement, and institution of PPV is an additional risk factor. Significantly high mortality was observed following PTX/PNM in critically ill COVID-19 patients and is an independent marker of poor prognosis in COVID-19 disease.